Panel scores and citation verification per section. Acknowledge every engineering judgment in the assumptions register to unlock sign-off.
Section quality 3 independent judges · no debate · dissent shown, never auto-resolved
1. Introduction
C 4.6G 4.4M 4.5
12/12 citations ✓4.5
3. Site Description
C 4.2G 4.0M 4.3
8/8 ✓4.2
5. Subsurface Conditions
C 4.1G 2.8M 4.3
9/9 ✓3.7 ⚠
6. Laboratory Test Results
C 4.4G 4.2M 4.4
5/5 ✓4.3
8. Recommendations
C 4.0G 3.9M 4.1
1 figure ref unresolved4.0
⚠ Gemini dissent on Section 5 — scored 2.8/5 on conservatism of the alluvial-lens interpretation. Review the critique or proceed; your decision is recorded in the audit trail either way. View in workspace →
Assumptions register 1 of 4 acknowledged
Elevated plasticity at BH04 interpreted as a localized alluvial lens rather than a systematic feature of the residual profile.
Section 5 · Subsurface Conditions
Laboratory results considered consistent with field classification; no further index testing recommended at this design stage.
Section 6 · Laboratory Test Results
Seasonal groundwater variation uncharacterised — single monitoring round; design groundwater level adopted at 2.5 m as a conservative allowance.
Section 7 · Discussion
Allowable bearing pressure of 250 kPa subject to confirmation by additional sampling near BH04 prior to detailed design.